The following video shows one nut case that happens to have a television show on the very fair and balanced MSNBC (I’m am oozing sarcasm, of course.):

It is time that MSNBC gave psychological exams to people that it puts on the air. The ownership at MSNBC should also examine why someone is allowed to call a Senator-elect a tea-bagger among other offensive remarks. It is unprofessional and uncalled for.

Senator-elect Scott Brown becomes the 41st vote and prevents the Democrats from having unlimited power in the Senate. They will need to negotiate with Republicans and make some concessions to get legislation moved through or they could face a filibuster. This reality and the fact that the voters spoke loudly and clearly has already stymied the Democrat’s efforts at ramming health care reform through Congress and on Americans.

Air America has always been a joke of a radio network. It tried to produce a counter-point to conservative talk radio and the Fox News network which many perceive as conservative. (I think Fox News is fair and balanced.) Air America failed to garner listeners and was built on the premise that there was a need for such a network. Everyone with a quarter of a brain knows that there is no need for such a network when you have MSNBC, CNBC and the “broadcast” networks constantly drinking the Obama Kool-Aid and praising his every move. If Obama farts, MSNBC will broadcast that our visionary commander-in-chief has developed a new fragrance that will make a better world and spread peace and tranquility worldwide. (This would be funny if it were not true.)

The third item that has Democrats worried is that the Supreme Court decided that McCain-Feingold and other measures restrict freedom of speech. They decided in a 5-4 vote that corporations, unions and other entities  should be allowed to spend as much as they want on political ads and campaigns. Democrats know that since they are so anti-capitalist, they will not get the majority of this spending. Chances are that Republicans will benefit hugely from this. If you look at what has happened to the stock market since Obama pledged to go after the banks, you can understand why business will not favor the Democrats.

Personally, I am happiest about the first two items. Scott Brown winning in Massachusetts is a great thing. He seems like a genuine person who may have a great future ahead of him. Air America was always a wacky network. They had comedian and now Senator Al Franken (D-MN) on the air for a while. Doesn’t that say it all?

I always considered campaign finance reform to be a good thing. I have never been one to believe that a government seat should be purchased by any special interest group or corporation. Then again, I am also not fond of groups like ACORN that skirt our laws. Perhaps unlimited spending will offset the registration of “Mickey Mouse” as a voter. One can only hope.

The fact is that Democrats have had a bad week. One that they will surely not forget soon.

Obama also suggested that the reason Brown won was that people are angry and that it was the same sentiment that got him elected to the Presidency. He believes that the anger and frustration is “not just because of what’s happened in the last year or two years, but what’s happened over the last eight years.” This is classic Obama still blaming George W. Bush. His statement forces me to quote Reagan one more time today, “There he goes again.”

According to the Reuters report, “investors reckoned the Massachusetts election of a Republican to the U.S. Senate was dollar positive as it might see the government rein in spending and reduce the fiscal deficit.” (You can read it here.) Several analysts and web sites are also predicting a stock market rally after Brown’s win. We will see if they were correct in a couple of hours today.

Regardless of the immediate impact on the dollar and the stock market, this victory is great for America. The Democrats needed a loud reminder of who is in charge—the American voter. This election should temper the Democrats’ desire to convert the United States into a secular-socialist country. That is not what so many have died building and defending. Maybe Obama will start reading some of Ronald Reagan’s speeches and quotes. Here is a good one for him: “We’ve been blessed with the opportunity to stand for something – for liberty and freedom and fairness.  And these are things worth fighting for, worth devoting our lives to.”

Perhaps this loss by the Democrats will require them to reexamine their goals, cynicism and negative view of the majority of the voters in this country. Maybe they should be reminded of what the United States really is by this Reagan quote: “The history of our civilization, the great advances that made it possible, is not a story of cynics or doom criers.  It is a gallant chronicle of the optimists, the determined people, men and women, who dreamed great dreams and dared to try whatever it took to make them come true.”

It is a new day for this country. Thank you Senator Scott Brown (R-MA).

Let’s hope for a Brown victory tonight. It will be a victory for the future of this country as well.

The frustration that voters are feeling with Obama and his legions is palpable. Voters have expressed this frustration at town hall meetings and in larger “tea party” demonstrations. Despite the obvious voter antipathy for team Obama’s plans and the trouncing of Democratic candidates in New Jersey and Virginia, the Democrats have not gotten the message and have continued to move forward in the most arrogant path I have ever seen. A Scott Brown win would have to wake up the tone deaf Democrats and just might succeed in stopping socialized medicine in its tracks as well as slowing or eliminating future attacks on our capitalist institutions and ways of life.

Attorney General Martha Coakley (D-MA) has a thin resume and has arrogantly presumed from the start of the campaign that she is entitled to the Senate seat because she is a Democrat. She and other Democrats also appear to presume that since Senator Ted Kennedy (D-MA) held the seat for 47 years they should continue to “own” that Senate seat. She has not spent as much time as Brown in one on one meetings with the public to better understand what they want from an elected official. She has also made major verbal gaffes like calling retired Boston Red Sox pitcher Curt Schilling a Yankee’s fan. Schilling, referring to the people of Massachusetts, has been quoted as saying that Coakley is “out of touch with who they are and what they are and what they want.” You can read his interesting opinions and the comments that other Massachusetts residents are posting at: http://38pitches.weei.com/

Democrats are doing everything they can to help Coakley. Obama has campaigned for her and filmed a commercial with her. Ted Kennedy’s widow, Vikki has endorsed her. President Clinton has been flown in for his star power and major pharmaceutical companies raised money for her in a Washington, D.C. event. These are the companies whose lobbyists are helping Coakley: Pfizer, Merck, Amgen, Sanofi-Aventis, Eli Lilly, Novartis, Astra-Zeneca, Blue Cross/Blue Shield, Cigna, Humana, HealthSouth, and United Health. Based on that list, do you think that Coakley is representing what is best for you? (Perhaps she and other Democrats are trying to push through a huge health care bill that benefits the large pharmaceuticals and insurance companies instead of us. That would be my educated guess.)

Let’s hope that all this push from the left ends in failure like it did in the New Jersey and Virginia governor’s races. So let’s hear a loud and resounding, “Go Brown!”